<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.reuters.com/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.reuters.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css" type="text/css" media="screen"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" --><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Good, Bad, and Ugly</title>
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu</link>
	<description>Reader reaction to Reuters news</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 12:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.reuters.com/reuters/blogs/gbu" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.reuters.com%2Freuters%2Fblogs%2Fgbu" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif">Subscribe with My Yahoo!</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsgator.com/ngs/subscriber/subext.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.reuters.com%2Freuters%2Fblogs%2Fgbu" src="http://www.newsgator.com/images/ngsub1.gif">Subscribe with NewsGator</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://feeds.my.aol.com/add.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.reuters.com%2Freuters%2Fblogs%2Fgbu" src="http://o.aolcdn.com/favorites.my.aol.com/webmaster/ffclient/webroot/locale/en-US/images/myAOLButtonSmall.gif">Subscribe with My AOL</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.rojo.com/add-subscription?resource=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.reuters.com%2Freuters%2Fblogs%2Fgbu" src="http://blog.rojo.com/RojoWideRed.gif">Subscribe with Rojo</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bloglines.com/sub/http://feeds.reuters.com/reuters/blogs/gbu" src="http://www.bloglines.com/images/sub_modern11.gif">Subscribe with Bloglines</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.netvibes.com/subscribe.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.reuters.com%2Freuters%2Fblogs%2Fgbu" src="http://www.netvibes.com/img/add2netvibes.gif">Subscribe with Netvibes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.reuters.com%2Freuters%2Fblogs%2Fgbu" src="http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif">Subscribe with Google</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.pageflakes.com/subscribe.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.reuters.com%2Freuters%2Fblogs%2Fgbu" src="http://www.pageflakes.com/ImageFile.ashx?instanceId=Static_4&amp;fileName=ATP_blu_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Pageflakes</feedburner:feedFlare><item>
		<title>Bad cropping…</title>
		<link>http://feeds.reuters.com/~r/reuters/blogs/gbu/~3/286050483/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/05/08/bad-cropping/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 12:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Good, the Bad, &amp; the Ugly Editor</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[corrections]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[feedback]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/05/08/bad-cropping/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a reuters photo of Obama circulating that includes a background picture with the &#8220;Change&#8221; banner cropped down to &#8220;Hang&#8221;. 
Some people may find this quite offensive and would have a very hard time believing this was just an honest mistake. Really looks like it was done on purpose, or there is no editing staff [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #0000ff"><a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/files/2008/05/change-360.jpg" title="change-360.jpg"><img align="left" width="360" src="http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/files/2008/05/change-360.jpg" alt="change-360.jpg" height="318" class="imageframe" /></a>There is a reuters photo of Obama circulating that includes a background picture with the &#8220;Change&#8221; banner cropped down to &#8220;Hang&#8221;. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff">Some people may find this quite offensive and would have a very hard time believing this was just an honest mistake. Really looks like it was done on purpose, or there is no editing staff whatsoever. Please remove it.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff">B.R.S.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000">We have deleted the photo, which was cropped for an online product by an editor who didn&#8217;t notice the unfortunate word the editing left behind. We had no possible reason to do this on purpose. GBU Editor</span></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?a=SIacOh"><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?i=SIacOh" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?a=SrPSDh"><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?i=SrPSDh" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?a=PxU5Ph"><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?i=PxU5Ph" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~r/reuters/blogs/gbu/~4/286050483" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/05/08/bad-cropping/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/05/08/bad-cropping/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Trouble with names…</title>
		<link>http://feeds.reuters.com/~r/reuters/blogs/gbu/~3/285790393/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/05/08/trouble-with-names/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 02:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Good, the Bad, &amp; the Ugly Editor</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/05/08/trouble-with-names/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scottish Labour says &#8220;bring on&#8221; independence vote 
The pro-independence Scottish Nationalist Party (SNP) formed a minority government after Scottish elections last year with a one-seat win over Labour, breaking decades of Labour hold on the country which has also provided key backing for the national party in Westminster.
Your story, while broadly accurate in reflecting the comments from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Scottish Labour says &#8220;bring on&#8221; independence vote</strong> </p>
<p>The pro-independence Scottish Nationalist Party (SNP) formed a minority government after Scottish elections last year with a one-seat win over Labour, breaking decades of Labour hold on the country which has also provided key backing for the national party in Westminster.</p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff">Your story, while broadly accurate in reflecting the comments from the various politicos involved, does contain one rather unfortunate error. The Scottish Nationalist Party in fact is the &#8217;Scottish National Party&#8217;. While this may seem a minor error I&#8217;m fairly sure the Conservative Party would never be described by reuters as the Conservation Party.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff">D. H.</span></p>
<p><strong>UK police find Himmler/Churchill archive forgeries</strong></p>
<p>Forensic examination revealed letterheads on documents purported to be written by Bernard Bracken, minister of information for wartime prime minister Churchill, in 1945 were made with a laser printer.</p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff"><span style="color: #0000ff">The Minister for Information in Churchill&#8217;s government was BRENDAN Bracken.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff"><span style="color: #0000ff">Veda</span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000"><span style="color: #ff0000">Readers were right in both cases. We corrected both: GBU Editor</span></span></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?a=O0zDph"><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?i=O0zDph" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?a=vKENJh"><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?i=vKENJh" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?a=mBYX5h"><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?i=mBYX5h" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~r/reuters/blogs/gbu/~4/285790393" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/05/08/trouble-with-names/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/05/08/trouble-with-names/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Wrong nationality</title>
		<link>http://feeds.reuters.com/~r/reuters/blogs/gbu/~3/285335032/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/05/07/wrong-nationality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 12:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Good, the Bad, &amp; the Ugly Editor</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[corrections]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[feedback]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[headlines]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/05/07/wrong-nationality/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Italy&#8217;s Bartoli cruises into third round in Berlin  
Italy&#8217;s Bartoli took just over 50 minutes at the Steffi Graf Stadium to become the first player to reach the third round of the $1.3 million clay-court tournament.
Your headline and story are incorrect. Marion Bartoli is a French tennis player, not Italian. 
V.C.  
You&#8217;re right, of course. We corrected. GBU Editor
REUTERS [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Italy&#8217;s Bartoli cruises into third round in Berlin</strong>  </p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/files/2008/05/bartoli-160.jpg" title="bartoli-160.jpg"><img align="left" width="160" src="http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/files/2008/05/bartoli-160.jpg" alt="bartoli-160.jpg" height="196" class="imageframe" /></a>Italy&#8217;s Bartoli took just over 50 minutes at the Steffi Graf Stadium to become the first player to reach the third round of the $1.3 million clay-court tournament.</p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff">Your headline and story are incorrect. Marion Bartoli is a French tennis player, not Italian. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff">V.C.  </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000">You&#8217;re right, of course. <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=correctionsNews&amp;storyID=2008-05-06T145958Z_01_L06298272_RTRIDST_0_TENNIS-WOMEN-BERLIN-CORRECTED-PIX.XML">We corrected</a>. GBU Editor</span></p>
<p align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000">REUTERS photo by Danny Moloshok </span></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?a=s8bR6h"><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?i=s8bR6h" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?a=tY51jh"><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?i=tY51jh" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?a=Iaw4bh"><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?i=Iaw4bh" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~r/reuters/blogs/gbu/~4/285335032" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/05/07/wrong-nationality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/05/07/wrong-nationality/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Gross Domestic Product</title>
		<link>http://feeds.reuters.com/~r/reuters/blogs/gbu/~3/283970719/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/05/05/gross-domestic-product/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 14:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Good, the Bad, &amp; the Ugly Editor</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[corrections]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[feedback]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/05/05/gross-domestic-product/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exxon profit disappoints despite high oil prices  
Exxon posted record earnings of $40.6 billion in 2007, with revenue higher than the gross domestic profit of Turkey, the world&#8217;s 17th-largest economy.
What is &#8220;gross domestic profit&#8221;? Is that something that only a Turkey has?
Hunter
We meant gross domestic product. We corrected: GBU Editor
REUTERS photo by Larry Downing

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Exxon profit disappoints despite high oil prices</strong>  </p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/files/2008/05/exxon-180.jpg" title="exxon-180.jpg"><img align="right" width="180" src="http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/files/2008/05/exxon-180.jpg" alt="exxon-180.jpg" height="106" /></a>Exxon posted record earnings of $40.6 billion in 2007, with revenue higher than the<a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/files/2008/05/exxon-180.jpg" title="exxon-180.jpg"></a> gross domestic profit of Turkey, the world&#8217;s 17th-largest economy.</p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff">What is &#8220;gross domestic profit&#8221;? Is that something that only a Turkey has?</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff">Hunter</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000">We meant gross domestic product. <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=correctionsNews&amp;storyID=2008-05-01T210709Z_01_WEN5385_RTRIDST_0_BUSINESSPROIND-EXXON-DC.XML">We corrected</a>: GBU Editor</span><span style="color: #ff0000"></span><span style="color: #ff0000"></span><span style="color: #ff0000"></p>
<p align="center">REUTERS photo by Larry Downing</p>
<p></span></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?a=CwH1Nh"><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?i=CwH1Nh" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?a=aXmkph"><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?i=aXmkph" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?a=REXDNh"><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?i=REXDNh" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~r/reuters/blogs/gbu/~4/283970719" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/05/05/gross-domestic-product/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/05/05/gross-domestic-product/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Proud, or really proud?</title>
		<link>http://feeds.reuters.com/~r/reuters/blogs/gbu/~3/282121208/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/05/02/proud-or-really-proud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 14:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Good, the Bad, &amp; the Ugly Editor</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[feedback]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/05/02/proud-or-really-proud/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama&#8217;s wife joins push to court US working class  
But she has stirred controversy, such as when she said in February: &#8220;For the first time in my adult life, I am proud of my country.&#8221; Critics said the comment sounded unpatriotic and suggested she had not been proud of her country before her husband&#8217;s candidacy.
Is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Obama&#8217;s wife joins push to court US working class</strong>  </p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/files/2008/05/obamas-200.jpg" title="obamas-200.jpg"><img align="left" width="200" src="http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/files/2008/05/obamas-200.jpg" alt="obamas-200.jpg" height="141" class="imageframe" /></a>But she has stirred controversy, such as when she said in February: &#8220;For the first<a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/files/2008/05/obamas-200.jpg" title="obamas-200.jpg"></a> <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/files/2008/05/obamas-200.jpg" title="obamas-200.jpg"></a><a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/files/2008/05/obamas-200.jpg" title="obamas-200.jpg"></a>time in my adult life, I am proud of my country.&#8221; Critics said the comment sounded unpatriotic and suggested she had not been proud of her country before her husband&#8217;s candidacy.</p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff">Is it nomral Reuters standard to misquote important people, when the misquote amounts to slander? </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff">Your writer left out the work REALLY from her quote &#8220;For the first time in my adult lifetime I am really proud of my country&#8221;.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff">Leave the quote accurate, and the quote states that this is the first time she has been really proud, or extra proud, AND implies that in the past she had been just proud. How dare you!!</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff">Tom</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000">Several readers disputed our version of this quote. Our story is accurate. She said it both ways,  </span><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WNGjawtP48"><span style="color: #0000ff">as you can see here</span></a><span style="color: #ff0000">: GBU Editor </span></p>
<p align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000">REUTERS photo by Jeff Haynes</span></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?a=ciH0bh"><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?i=ciH0bh" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?a=OvjSph"><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?i=OvjSph" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?a=9Zx95h"><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?i=9Zx95h" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~r/reuters/blogs/gbu/~4/282121208" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/05/02/proud-or-really-proud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/05/02/proud-or-really-proud/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The wrong time frame</title>
		<link>http://feeds.reuters.com/~r/reuters/blogs/gbu/~3/282018436/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/05/02/the-wrong-time-frame/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 10:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Good, the Bad, &amp; the Ugly Editor</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[corrections]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[feedback]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/05/02/the-wrong-time-frame/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Medtronic unit agrees to consent decree with FDA
In September, Medtronic announced plans to eliminate about 200 jobs in the Physio-Control unit.
This statement is not correct, and has our employees concerned. Is it possible to print a correction? It refers to actions taken in the past, not planned for the future.
Anne
Yes. We subsequently issued a correction making [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Medtronic unit agrees to consent decree with FDA</strong></p>
<p>In September, Medtronic announced plans to eliminate about 200 jobs in the Physio-Control unit.</p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff">This statement is not correct, and has our employees concerned. Is it possible to print a correction? It refers to actions taken in the past, not planned for the future.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff">Anne</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000">Yes. We subsequently</span> <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNews/idUSN2846857320080428">issued a correction</a> <span style="color: #ff0000">making clear that the layoffs took place in March 2007, and were not announced in September 2007. GBU Editor<br />
</span></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?a=ATAOvh"><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?i=ATAOvh" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?a=gbiLbh"><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?i=gbiLbh" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?a=UnOznh"><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?i=UnOznh" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~r/reuters/blogs/gbu/~4/282018436" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/05/02/the-wrong-time-frame/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/05/02/the-wrong-time-frame/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The devil is in the details</title>
		<link>http://feeds.reuters.com/~r/reuters/blogs/gbu/~3/281464469/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/05/01/the-devil-is-in-the-details/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 14:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Good, the Bad, &amp; the Ugly Editor</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[corrections]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[feedback]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[headlines]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/05/01/the-devil-is-in-the-details/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Devil Rays sweep Red Sox with 3-0 win
ST. PETERSBURG, Florida (Reuters) - James Shields pitched a two-hit shutout on Sunday as the Tampa Bay Devil Rays completed a three-game sweep of the Boston Red Sox with a 3-0 victory.
The headline on this article is so WRONG!!! Did your editor even READ the article?? Did he LOOK [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Devil Rays sweep Red Sox with 3-0 win</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/files/2008/04/rays-200.jpg" title="rays-200.jpg"><img align="left" width="200" src="http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/files/2008/04/rays-200.jpg" alt="rays-200.jpg" height="149" class="imageframe" /></a>ST. PETERSBURG, Florida (Reuters) - James Shields pitched a two-hit shutout on Sunday as the Tampa Bay Devil Rays completed a three-game sweep of the Boston Red Sox with a 3-0 victory.</p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff">The headline on this article is so WRONG!!! Did your editor even READ the article?? Did he LOOK at the headline?? The team is no longer refered to as the &#8220;Devil&#8221; Rays. They have dropped any reference to Devil from the stadium, uniforms, locker room, everything. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff">Heck, the featured picture even shows clearly &#8220;RAYS&#8221; right across the front. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff">W.C.M.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff">Please let your reporter know that the correct name for the MLB team in Tampa Bay, Florida is the RAYS, not the Devil Rays. Maybe he hasn&#8217;t been covering baseball since the name change was announced, so please let him know.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff">A Fan</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000">Lots of people noticed this one. We are aware of the change, and hope we don&#8217;t make this error again: GBU Editor</span></p>
<p align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000">REUTERS photo by Steve Nesius</span></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?a=xBav1h"><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?i=xBav1h" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?a=fJwxBh"><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?i=fJwxBh" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?a=H0Ldyh"><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?i=H0Ldyh" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~r/reuters/blogs/gbu/~4/281464469" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/05/01/the-devil-is-in-the-details/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/05/01/the-devil-is-in-the-details/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Not the first time…</title>
		<link>http://feeds.reuters.com/~r/reuters/blogs/gbu/~3/280707487/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/04/30/not-the-first-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Good, the Bad, &amp; the Ugly Editor</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[corrections]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[feedback]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/04/30/not-the-first-time/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Calzaghe accuses Hopkins of being a sore loser
Apart from Hopkins&#8217; straight right that floored Calzaghe for the first time in his career, neither fighter landed many telling shots in a scrappy clash of styles.
Byron Mitchell knocked down Calzaghe in June 2003.  Here is a link so you can see for yourself.
Mike M. 
We corrected: GBU [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Calzaghe accuses Hopkins of being a sore loser</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/files/2008/04/boxer-160.jpg" title="boxer-160.jpg"><img align="left" width="160" src="http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/files/2008/04/boxer-160.jpg" alt="boxer-160.jpg" height="161" class="imageframe" /></a>Apart from Hopkins&#8217; straight right that floored Calzaghe for the first time in his career, neither fighter landed many telling shots in a scrappy clash of styles.</p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff">Byron Mitchell knocked down Calzaghe in June 2003.  </span><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/3016900.stm"><span style="color: #0000ff">Here is a link</span></a><span style="color: #0000ff"> so you can see for yourself.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff">Mike M. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000">We corrected: GBU Editor  </span></p>
<p align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000">REUTERS photo by R. Marsh Starks </span></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?a=ZAJSJg"><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?i=ZAJSJg" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?a=wQ9Awg"><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?i=wQ9Awg" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?a=ln7Pdg"><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?i=ln7Pdg" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~r/reuters/blogs/gbu/~4/280707487" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/04/30/not-the-first-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/04/30/not-the-first-time/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Hitting out at a headline</title>
		<link>http://feeds.reuters.com/~r/reuters/blogs/gbu/~3/280140317/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/04/29/hitting-out-at-a-headline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Good, the Bad, &amp; the Ugly Editor</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[feedback]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[headlines]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/04/29/hitting-out-at-a-headline/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama hits out at Clinton for negative campaign 
Hits out&#8230; who ever heard of such a thing?  I guess you will save the term &#8220;LASHES OUT&#8221; for the Republican candidate?
Michael
What does &#8220;hits out&#8221; mean? I&#8217;ve never used &#8220;hits out&#8221; in my life and I have never heard anyone use it. 
B.E.
It&#8217;s not terribly obscure. My dictionary includes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Obama hits out at Clinton for negative campaign</strong> </p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff"><a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/files/2008/04/obama-180.jpg" title="obama-180.jpg"><img align="left" width="180" src="http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/files/2008/04/obama-180.jpg" alt="obama-180.jpg" height="187" class="imageframe" /></a><span style="color: #0000ff">Hits out&#8230; who ever heard of such a thing?  I guess you will save the term &#8220;LASHES OUT&#8221; for the Republican candidate?</span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff"><span style="color: #0000ff">Michael</span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff"><span style="color: #0000ff">What does &#8220;hits out&#8221; mean? I&#8217;ve never used &#8220;hits out&#8221; in my life and I have never heard anyone use it. </span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff"><span style="color: #0000ff">B.E.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000"><span style="color: #ff0000">It&#8217;s not terribly obscure. My dictionary includes the following as one definition for the word hit: &#8220;to assail effectively and sharply (often fol. by <em minmax_bound="true">out</em>): The speech hits out at warmongering.&#8221; GBU Editor</span></span></p>
<p align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000"><span style="color: #ff0000">REUTERS photo by Frank Polich </span></span></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?a=VhUEbg"><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?i=VhUEbg" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?a=N59Reg"><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?i=N59Reg" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?a=Gzv9lg"><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?i=Gzv9lg" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~r/reuters/blogs/gbu/~4/280140317" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/04/29/hitting-out-at-a-headline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/04/29/hitting-out-at-a-headline/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Warning shots?</title>
		<link>http://feeds.reuters.com/~r/reuters/blogs/gbu/~3/280073123/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/04/29/warning-shots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Good, the Bad, &amp; the Ugly Editor</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[feedback]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/04/29/warning-shots/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ship hired by US military fires warning shots in Gulf  
In March, another U.S. military-chartered ship preparing to cross the Suez Canal fired warning shots at a small boat, killing an Egyptian on board.  
Warning shots? You do not get killed by warning shots. Why do you allow your writers to merely repeat what the military&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ship hired by US military fires warning shots in Gulf</strong>  </p>
<p>In March, another U.S. military-chartered ship preparing to cross the Suez Canal fired warning shots at a small boat, killing an Egyptian on board.  </p>
<p><span style="color: #3366ff">Warning shots? You do not get killed by warning shots. Why do you allow your writers to merely repeat what the military&#8217;s public relations officers say? It&#8217;s no wonder the Bush administration was able to drag us into war in Iraq as easily as they did.  </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #3366ff">Alex </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #3366ff"><span style="color: #ff0000">It does seem that when someone is killed, the distinction between warning shots and just plain shooting at the boat is pretty difficult to spot: GBU Editor</span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #3366ff"></span></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?a=YCtlLg"><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?i=YCtlLg" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?a=ophFrg"><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?i=ophFrg" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?a=MMoCSg"><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/blogs/gbu?i=MMoCSg" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.reuters.com/~r/reuters/blogs/gbu/~4/280073123" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/04/29/warning-shots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/04/29/warning-shots/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
